Miran,
This bug has not been approved for JDK 8, in fact it was considered and
rejected. The fix should be pushed to jdk9/dev, if applicable. If the
patches apply cleanly I can push it for you. Do you want it in JDK 9?
-Chris.
On 24/01/14 09:41, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Hi Chris,
thanks for reviewing - I generated the patches today again so now it
should be ok:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2012-v02.patch
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2013-v02.patch
Could you push it for me? I have no rights for jdk8.
I suppose the commit dates (must be in the past) would be imported
correctly:
copyrights-2012-v02.patch: -d "2012-12-30"
copyrights-2013-v02.patch: -d "2013-12-30"
Thanks
Miran
On 23/01/14 10:07, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 23 Jan 2014, at 08:53, Martin Grebac <martin.gre...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Miran, did you get any response on this yet?
MartiNG
On 17/01/14 10:57, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Hi Steve and Alan,
I just reminding this issue - I have no response from anybody yet
and it would really simplify our integration if I could handle
copyright years inconsistencies this way - I see this issue in many
jdk branches and these "each-branch-different" changes make each
integration much more pain.
Thanks for any idea on this.
Miran
On 10/01/14 18:05, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Hi,
this is about fixing copyright years for jdk8 (!); the incorrect
years found for both 2012 and 2013, so not to confuse script
jdk8/make/scripts/update_copyright_year.sh
it is necessary to use option -d "<date>" for commit. I tested that
and it seems to work perfect.
I used following:
[2012 modifications]
hg commit -u mkos -l ../2012-msg.txt -d "2012-12-30"
[2013 modifications]
hg commit -u mkos -l ../2013-msg.txt -d "2013-12-30"
When commits performed with past date, update_copyright_year.sh
script finds those in proper years. Since I am not familiar with
using webrev for pushing changes, I exported both revisions into
separate patches:
2012: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2012.patch
I skimmed the patch and it looks ok to me.
Trivially, it contains a 2013 update (which it should probably be in
the 2013 patch)
diff -r 91f5c542ccad -r d6aec26c9771 make/Makefile
--- a/make/Makefile Fri Jan 03 11:54:55 2014 -0800
+++ b/make/Makefile Sun Dec 30 00:00:00 2012 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#
-# Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+# Copyright (c) 2012, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
reserved.
# DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
#
2013: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2013.patch
Looks ok to me.
-Chris.
all changes webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/webrev-all.00/ (upload
still in progress, I hope it doesn't take more than 30 mins)
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029237
Regards
Miran
--
Martin Grebac, SW Engineering Manager
Oracle Czech, Prague
