On 02/06/2014 11:41 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Me again ;-)
On 02/06/2014 10:30 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
But why not just coding:
2558 char ch = value[first];
2559 if (Character.isSurrogate(ch) {
2560 hasSurr = true;
2561 break;
2562 }
2563 if (ch != Character.toLowerCase((int)ch)) { // no need to
check Character.ERROR
2564 break;
2565 }
There already is Character.isUpperCase().
I don't see, why (ch != Character.toLowerCase((int)ch) should perform better.
But there is a bug in javadoc ;-)
Your Report (Review ID: JI-9010267) - Error in doc of
Character.isLowerCase/UpperCase(char)
-Ulf
"ch != Character.toLowerCase((int)ch)" and "Character.isUpperCase(ch)" are
not equal for some code points...don't ask me why, please:-)
-Sherman
