I'm curious to compare performance on huge numbers between this pure Java implementation of SS and some native implementation of SS (libgmp, for example).
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Tim Buktu <tbu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 8014320 is a JDK9 enhancement and everybody is probably busy with JDK8, > but I wanted to let the BigInteger people know the patch is finished. It > consists of 3 patched files and 1 new file; they can be found at > > > https://github.com/tbuktu/bigint/raw/5142a961252b2cd217377f32e4351640086c94e2/src/main/java/java/math/BigInteger.java > > https://github.com/tbuktu/bigint/raw/fe807bf92b58cf8a4556b3f8473f1b6dd35412b7/src/main/java/java/math/MutableModFn.java > > https://github.com/tbuktu/bigint/raw/3bd7329d93540a839582afb62c6ce40e243b3e47/src/main/java/java/math/MutableBigInteger.java > > https://github.com/tbuktu/bigint/raw/557584cba766507fe18d0cca5e8f03f45b483223/src/test/java/BigIntegerTest.java > > The SS and Barrett thresholds are from timings on an Intel CPU. An AMD > CPU gave me lower values; I didn't try any other architectures. I used > the program at the link below to find the thresholds: > > https://github.com/tbuktu/bigint/blob/master/src/main/java/Tune.java > > Tim >
