On Mar 14, 2014, at 3:39 AM, Peter Levart wrote: > But in general it would be better to just use "ThreadLocalRandom.current()" > everywhere you use "rnd" variable. This is precisely it's purpose - a random > number generator that is never contended. The overhead of > ThreadLocalRandom.current() call is hardly measurable by itself.
I'll update that and re-run some of the benchmarks later. Thanks, Brian
