link: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/index_of_with_char.zip
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana < otavioj...@java.net> wrote: > > link: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/index_of_with_char.zip > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com>wrote: > >> On Apr 27, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Claes Redestad <claes.redes...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> > Possibly a few bytes in static class footprint, sure. Maybe this is >> something javac should optimize (javap on some trivial examples suggests >> this doesn't happen) rather than trying to root out all suboptimal cases, >> especially since there are bound to be a lot more code out there using >> similar patterns? >> > >> >> While javac can and perhaps should be smarter in certain cases like this >> i am still supportive of this change in the JDK esp. so if it is something >> trivially detectable by IDEs; it's low-hanging fruit. >> >> Paul. >> > > > > -- > Atenciosamente. > > Otávio Gonçalves de Santana > > blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava > site: http://www.otaviojava.com.br > (11) 98255-3513 > > -- Atenciosamente. Otávio Gonçalves de Santana blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/ twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava site: http://www.otaviojava.com.br (11) 98255-3513
