Yes, that looks more consistent with the current versions.
Though you want to see these for 8u, the preferred pattern is to make
the changes
in 9 and then backport the result (in this case adding the shared
secrets aspect).
Roger
On 6/16/2014 4:13 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
...
The terminology used in java.lang.String for offsets and indexes into
strings would
be provide a consistent base for talking about substrings.
If we're taking cues from String.substring, I guess int beginIndex[,
int fromIndex] would be more appropriate. How about:
/**
* Parses the character sequence argument in the specified {@code
radix},
* beginning at the specified {@code beginIndex} and extending to the
* character at index {@code endIndex - 1}.
*
* @see java.lang.Integer#parseInt(String, int)
* @param s the {@code CharSequence} containing the integer
* representation to be parsed
* @param radix the radix to be used while parsing {@code s}.
* @param beginIndex the beginning index, inclusive.
* @param endIndex the ending index, exclusive.
* @return the integer represented by the subsequence in the
* specified radix.
*/
static int parseInt(CharSequence s, int radix, int beginIndex, int
endIndex)
?
Thanks!
/Claes
