Thanks!

-Pavel

On 15 Jul 2014, at 15:41, Vincent Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:

> The LDAP changes look fine to me.
> Thanks.
> 
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 15:07, Mark Sheppard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Pavel,
>>  the changes look ok .... I've run some relevant jck tests (naming 
>> management rmi) and the CORBA regression suite
>> for the changeset, with no perceptible issues
>> 
>> regards
>> Mark
>> 
>> On 14/07/2014 12:43, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> Could you please review my change for JDK-8048175?
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048175/webrev.00/
>>> 
>>> Summary
>>> 
>>> 1. com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection imports both java.net.InetSocketAddress and 
>>> javax.net.SocketFactory which are available since 1.4
>>> 2. com.sun.jndi.toolkit.corba.CorbaUtils defines 3 imports from java.rmi 
>>> and java.rmi.CORBA. Justification: CorbaUtils is used by the 
>>> com.sun.jndi.cosnaming package which resides in CORBA module. Which in turn 
>>> has a dependency on RMI module.
>>> 3. com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.RemoteToCorba.getStateToBind method doesn't 
>>> handle ClassNotFoundException internally. There's no need for that now (see 
>>> 2).
>>> 4. com.sun.jndi.ldap.VersionHelper instantiates only the 
>>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.VersionHelper12. Justification: the rudimentary test for 
>>> jdk version is no longer needed as JNDI is a part of the platform and 
>>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.VersionHelper11 is no longer available (at least since 
>>> 1.3).
>>> 
>>> All corresponding reflection usages have been removed.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> -Pavel
>> 
> 

Reply via email to