On 7/16/14 8:59 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This looks like a reasonable reversal of 6898747 [1], so good for me.
Yes this dependency is no longer an issue. It looks okay to keep the static reference.
Mandy
-Chris. [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/rev/a368ebcfeeb6 On 16/07/14 16:41, Pavel Rappo wrote:Hi everyone, Could you please review my change for JDK-8050869? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8050869/webrev.00/ Thanks -Pavel
