Hi Xueming, On 09/17/2014 08:13 PM, Xueming Shen wrote: > String.hashCode() has intrinsics,
No, we have no intrinsics for String.hashCode. We do have a native implementation for VM internal purposes though, but it's irrelevant here. > so I don't think we are seeing the real performance "difference" of > the implementations. No, we are seeing the difference, but it is about consistently and slightly different code generation, see the disassemblies linked in the bug report. Really, the performance run was to look out for regressions, and there is no indication there is one. > My guess is the original one probably is faster. No, it is not. Btw, that guess is inconsistent with a hypothesis we have intrinsics for String.hashCode() ;) Thanks, -Aleksey.
