On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Aleksey Shipilev <aleksey.shipi...@oracle.com> wrote: > I think "implies the effect of C++11" is too strong wording. "related" > might be more appropriate.
I've been struggling to come up with better wording. The latest webrev says + * Corresponds to C11 atomic_thread_fence(memory_order_acquire). but I'm not totally happy with that either. "Essentially equivalent to" ?
