> Apologies Patrick, that's me who misread you. I assume I had a mix of your > reply, our recent conversation and David’s question in my head.
No problem > About your actual reply. That's probably a matter of taste, since nowhere else > except for this particular method this thing is not used (in > java.nio.file.Files > BUFFER_SIZE const is referenced 3 times). > It's more like java.io.InputStream#MAX_SKIP_BUFFER_SIZE, which is more of an > explanatory purpose than anything else, I suppose. > You’re right, I would have added such a constant, as it could be used at least twice: [..] byte[] buffer = new byte[BUFFER_SIZE]; for (int read; (read = this.read(buffer, 0, BUFFER_SIZE)) > -1; [..] > -Pavel > >> On 9 Dec 2014, at 23:05, Patrick Reinhart <patr...@reini.net> wrote: >> >> You got exactly my point :-) I will try to improve my english and express >> myself more clearly the next time ;-) > -Patrick
