Looks OK stuart.  Another test I looked at last week but forgot to reply

On Dec 16, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Stuart Marks <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, any reviewers for this changeset?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> s'marks
> 
> On 12/12/14 12:05 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Please review this small fix and cleanup to this test. The old version would
>> force garbage collection of an unreferenced RMI object by allocating lots and
>> lots of memory until OOME is received, which takes a long time and could 
>> cause a
>> timeout. The better approach is simply to unexport the object.
>> 
>> I also did additional cleanups, such as not leaking the reference to 'this' 
>> from
>> within the constructor, making comments and messages more concise, etc.
>> 
>> Webrev:
>> 
>>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/8035117/webrev.0/
>> 
>> Bug:
>> 
>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035117
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> s'marks



Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
[email protected]



Reply via email to