On Feb 12, 2015, at 7:00 PM, Louis Wasserman <lowas...@google.com> wrote:
> How often does the case when you "have a lambda handy already" come up in > practice? If this leads to people using this method instead of ifPresent, > that seems wasteful. > A lambda bearing ifPresent is already "present" (sorry!) :-) this is just filling it out to be consistent for a terminal operation with an empty action. > Guava's Optional succeeded as much for what it left out as what it had in -- > I confess this makes me nervous that j.u.Optional is becoming a kitchen sink. > Yes, i most definitely share this concern. I have already closed a few optional issues as will not fix. FWIW I don't plan on adding any more stuff. Paul.
