On 27 February 2015 at 10:55, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: >> I don't think I saw an issue raised for caching the clock in ZoneId. >> That seems like a good plan to me (ZoneId instances are controlled >> singletons, so there is no big memory issue there) > > I'd been intending to log that. Thanks for reminding me! > Here is the issue: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074023
I've commented on the issue. Its a little more complex than I thought, but perfectly do-able. Just needs some ZoneId instances to be cached as well. Stephen
