On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Xueming Shen <xueming.s...@oracle.com> wrote:
> The result looks good, though I doubt it will bring in any real > "meaningful" performance > improvement when reading a zip/jar file. But faster is faster. > You're right - it will make a 20% improvement in something that is only a small part of java startup. But it's still worth it. > The same improvement might > not applied to the java version, given those range check? > I think a similar future change to ZipConstants and friends will also be worth it. Other jar/zip changes coming as well.
