On 4/21/2015 11:41 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 04/21/2015 02:20 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
OK. I think it's better to follow up this after further discussion for
the deprivileging work and understand what can or can't be done in
editing the policy files. For now, we should keep existing behavior to
grant jdk.xml.dom AllPermissions. How does that sound?
Actually, if all that is in the module is interfaces, and there are no
permission checks in default/static methods, I don't think any
permissions are necessary. So I think the webrev is fine as is.
Thanks Sean. Yes, they are purely interfaces, no default/static
methods. The only references to java.xml are a few DOM types that are
not restricted.
BTW, I also added the @Test annotation back. It does run within JTreg,
but not NetBeans as Lance noted.
http://sc11137378.us.oracle.com:8080/myhome/openjdk/webrevs/jdk9/8078139/webrev/
Thanks,
Joe
--Sean
