On 05/11/2015 05:46 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > > On May 11, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> It would be good to extend the test coverage. In this case it was caught >>> by JCK so not an OpenJDK test. >> >> Well, that's something of a philosophical issue: should we really >> duplicate TCK tests in our regression test suite? Also, I must point >> out that there is an OpenJDK TCK licence available. > > One point is that the regression tests are much more tractable to run.
Well, yeah. I have to confess that I did not run the TCK tests for this bug, so you may have a point... Andrew.
