On May 22, 2015, at 9:56 PM, "O'Leary, Kristen" <Kristen.O'le...@gs.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > We've created an additional test based on your suggestion: an array of size > 10,000,000, 32 pair flips, a run of zeroes in the middle, and 32 pair flips > at the end. Here are the results for int: > Benchmark (listType) > Mode Cnt Score Error Units > SortingIntTestJMH.sortCurrentWay pairFlipZeroPairFlip thrpt 10 4.886 > ± 0.031 ops/s > SortingIntTestJMH.sortNewWay pairFlipZeroPairFlip thrpt 10 > 14.793 ± 0.217 ops/s > > We also created a similar test which is 10, 5 repeated 32 times, a run of 100 > in the middle, and 10, 5 repeated 32 times at the end. Here are the results > again for int: > Benchmark (listType) > Mode Cnt Score Error Units > SortingIntTestJMH.sortCurrentWay pairFlipOneHundredPairFlip thrpt 10 > 4.936 ± 0.040 ops/s > SortingIntTestJMH.sortNewWay pairFlipOneHundredPairFlip thrpt 10 > 18.472 ± 0.217 ops/s > > As Moh mentioned on a different thread, we will work with Sunny on getting > the tests to you. >
Thanks those number look good. Paul.
