Hi Joe, Paul, On 30/06/15 10:47, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
OK - I will replace the offending diamonds before pushing.
On 30/06/15 10:49, Paul Sandoz wrote:> I am beseech you not to do that! > > Unless there is a really strong reason why JAXP 8 code should be the > same as JAXP 9 code we should be able to leverage new language and > API features. I don't know of any such reason, so assuming that we > should not treat JAXP code any differently from other JDK code where > such changes have already been made and from which you will get > squiggly red lines. I surrender. Let's keep the shiny diamonds... The patch will go as reviewed then. best regards, -- daniel
