> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Remi Forax <[email protected]> wrote: >> IMO, it seems to be a bug of the CDI implementation, >> as you said the method corresponding to the lambda body is synthetized so it >> should be ignored by the CDI implementation, no ?
I concur with Remi’s prescription; CDI should be ignoring synthetic members. > >> BTW, it's the wrong list, lambdas are delivered so you should have use >> core-lib-dev instead (in CC). > > core-lib-dev, hmm, who would have thought? But I'll keep it in mind > for future messages. Thanks! Actually since you’re asking about changes in compiler behavior, compiler-dev might be the right choice here. But Remi is correct, lambda-dev is finished, and now lambda-related questions go to the appropriate jdk component list.
