Hi Stephen,
Yes, things that logically go together can be in the same bug/issue and
be handled with a single
review cycle to keep the overhead down.
Thanks, Roger
On 9/10/2015 10:08 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Shall I just open a number of these with things to be changed, so you
can deal with them in a batch then?
Stephen
On 10 September 2015 at 14:42, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I can take it up but probably won't get to it until after JavaOne. (Early
Nov)
Roger
On 9/8/2015 2:53 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Anyone like to take this on please?
Stephen
On 28 Aug 2015 00:07, "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
External question sites indicate that users have difficulty converting
between java.util.Date and LocalDate, and also between Instant and
LocalDate/LocalTime. This user difficulty can be resolved with some
additional methods.
Currently, the following methods exist:
ZonedDateTime.ofInstant(Instant, ZoneId);
OffsetDateTime.ofInstant(Instant, ZoneId);
LocalDateTime.ofInstant(Instant, ZoneId);
OffsetTime.ofInstant(Instant, ZoneId);
This enhancement proposes to add the same method to LocalDate and
LocalTime. It can reasonably be argued this was a simple oversight in
the original development.
Diff attached to the JIRA:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133079
Would also appreciate a reviewer to ensure that the code and tests
pass OK (as opposed to my best efforts on a very dubious
Windows/Eclipse/JDK8 setup)
Stephen
