On 10/7/15 2:30 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Given what we know now vs when the collections library ws created, I
think it would be a mistake to allow nulls. Developers that
desperately want null in there have other mechanisms to achieve that,
not just Optional. I too would argue against Optional in collections,
at least until value types exist, but thats a social discussion, not
one that can be controlled.
Nicely put.
It seems there's some consensus to disallow nulls. Whew! One bikeshed down,
23,498 to go. :-)
s'marks
