On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Sure. I would have thought, though, that java.util.concurrent was a > natural home for this. Is there any kind of userland spinlock which > is not about concurrency? > > Andrew. > Spinning is not always for a spinlock. Most of the time is a lightweight & userland only wait/notify implementation. Or park/unpark equivalent which tends to fit into LockSupport like Paul Sandoz suggests. *Jean-Philippe Bempel* *|* Software Architect* |* *ULLINK |* T: +33 1 49 95 10 29 | 23-25 rue de Provence | 75009 Paris | *jpbem...@ullink.com* <jpbem...@ullink.com> | -- *The information contained in or attached to this email is strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the message to us.*
