On 10/30/2015 03:39 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Oct 30, 2015, at 12:59 PM, David M. Lloyd <david.ll...@redhat.com> wrote:
Since this is very likely to be a one-implementation API, is there a reason to 
have a separate WalkerOption interface and Option enum?  Seems like you could 
just skip the interface.

Locals and operands is one experimental feature in mind that is not target for 
JDK 9.   But it would be an interesting feature for e.g. Fibers to experiment.  
This will also allow JDK-specific capability to be implemented in the future.

Ah, that makes sense, I forgot about cases where the JDK itself might have non-spec extensions. It should probably be specified in the docs that unrecognized options are either ignored or rejected though.

All that boxing seems unnecessary... the next best candidate I can see though 
is IntToLongFunction.  I wonder why we didn't do an IntToIntFunction in JSR 
335.  Or maybe the stream itself should be somehow made aware of the optimum 
batch size.  What's the use case for changing the batch size as you iterate?
Is the traversal *that* expensive?

Altering the first batch size would be useful for Log4J and Groovy use cases 
that filter implementation classes and finds the caller.   Altering subsequent 
batch size is more as a flexible option.  One can simple have the function to 
return the same batch size.

Maybe an overload of walk() which accepts an int (initial batch size) in addition to the function for the simple case?

I do think IntSupplier is probably a better choice that won’t restrict to 
supply only the initial batch size.   The last batch size parameter is solely 
for information.

UnaryOperator is a good option too (that's what I was looking for before), or maybe even ToIntFunction<X> where X is something that might inform the next batch size based on the work that has already been done - maybe even a Stream<StackFrame> that consists only of the current batch?

Or another idea:
<T> T walk(BiFunction<Stream<StackWalker.StackFrame>, IntConsumer, T> function);

where the IntConsumer can be called at any time to update a minimum number of remaining frames needed, which in turn can (with the knowledge of how many elements have been consumed by the stream) inform the next batch size.

--
- DML

Reply via email to