On 11/5/15 9:43 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Thanks Daniel.   I haven’t found the cycle to pull down your updates from the 
logging sandbox to review

If the change is the same as you sent me earlier, your change should be good to 
go.

Yes - the changes are the same that you reviewed earlier. The only difference is that I added
tests for verifying the new changes.

best regards,

- daniel

Mandy

On Nov 3, 2015, at 12:12 PM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote:

Hi Mandy,

I have pushed an update that adds the diagnosability tweaks
you asked me for in LoggerFinderLoader.
I also added a couple of new tests.
No changes in the API specification.

The sandbox JDK-8046565-branch and public links have been refreshed.

best regards,

-- daniel

sandbox branch JDK-8046565-branch
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/docs/sandbox.html

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/8046565/proto.02/webrev/index.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/8046565/proto.02/specdiff-api/overview-summary.html


On 23/10/15 16:52, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,

Please find below the online link integrating the latest editorial
comments I received (from Mandy):

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/8046565/proto.02/webrev/index.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/8046565/proto.02/specdiff-api/overview-summary.html


sandbox branch JDK-8046565-branch updated as well.

best regards

-- daniel

Start of the review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-October/035715.html

Subject: RFR: JDK-8046565: Platform Logger API and Service

JEP 264 JBS Issue (8046565):
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046565

RFE that will be ultimately used to commit (8140364):
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140364

Reply via email to