> On 16 Nov 2015, at 22:39, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Smaller than wave 1, but still large.  Nothing like a looming deadline to 
> spur work ...
> 
> Oracle folks will need to help with API review.
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=(subcomponent%20%3D%20java.util.concurrent)%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22In%20Progress%22%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate%20DESC
>  
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=(subcomponent%20%3D%20java.util.concurrent)%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22In%20Progress%22%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate%20DESC>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/>
> 
> The primary focus is making jtreg tests more robust and faster.
> It also contains the changes to j.u.c.atomic that Aleksey is waiting for.

For the jtregTest updates, if you have any excess energy remaining, you might 
want to consider adding the jtreg randomness tag (i cannot recall its exact 
name) to the test metadata.

Paul.

Reply via email to