> On Dec 17, 2015, at 6:02 AM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Mandy, > > I believe it would be good to have some test that go over > the 1024 limit - as this has been useful to detect bugs > when we were actively prototyping the API. > > So maybe we should first try to reduce from 2000 to e.g. 1028? >
Are you relating 1024 to the MaxJavaStackTraceDepth? That is the max depth of builtin backtrace. StackWalker no longer has the maxDepth. Mandy > best regards, > > -- daniel > > On 16/12/15 21:30, Mandy Chung wrote: >> This is a test fix to reduce the stack depth to avoid StackOverFlow when >> running with -Xcomp on solaris sparc. >> >> Webrev: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8144553/webrev.00/index.html >> >> I verified the tests on solaris-sparcv9 machine with fastdebug VM -Xcomp -ea >> -esa. >> >> Mandy >> >
