On 11/01/2016 21:44, Iris Clark wrote:
Hi, Joe, Roger, Alan, Magnus, and Mandy.
At the end of December (shortly before the Christmas/Winter
break and my vacation), I provided responses to your messages
and an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/verona/8072379/webrev.2/
I didn't hear from anybody, so I'd like to optimistically assume
that you were satisfied. Is that correct?
For you convenience, here's a reference to the December and November
threads:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-December/037062.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-November/036904.html
I'd like to wrap up this work for the initial implementation of
jdk.Version soon.
I think this looks good but we'll to decide which module to put this in.
It can't be java.base (see design principles in JEP 200). If it's going
into java.base temporarily then the top-level modules.xml will need to
be updated to export the "jdk" package.
-Alan
