On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Tagir F. Valeev <amae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some more thoughts about forEachRemaining: > > To me it seems that > if ((a = lst.elementData) != null) > is a redundant check as well as in current ArrayList implementation > elementData is never null. So it can be replaced with simple > assignment. The null check for something that is provably non-null is a sign of the hand of Doug Lea. I'm often tempted to try to remove them from j.u.concurrent as well, but I resist. They may help hotspot generate better code.
