Hi, Alan. > Good to have this in but now we need to decide on where it > should live. It's JDK-specific so we'll need it exported > by a JDK module rather than java.base.
8144062 was next on my list. Do you have any suggestions for the module? Of the existing modules in the jdk repository, jdk.dev seems to have the most appropriate name. It appears to only contain jimage so I'm not sure about that module's charter. Thanks, iris -----Original Message----- From: Alan Bateman Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 12:53 AM To: Iris Clark; Mandy Chung Cc: verona-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR: 8072379: Implement jdk.Version and jdk.OracleVersion On 03/02/2016 03:17, Iris Clark wrote: > Hi, Mandy. > > Thanks so much for pushing the changeset for the initial > implementation of jdk.Version! > Good to have this in but now we need to decide on where it should live. It's JDK-specific so we'll need it exported by a JDK module rather than java.base. -Alan
