Just a follow-up, to avoid causing additional merge headaches, I'll
revise the patch to make this change once the next round of Jigsaw
changes get back in jdk9/dev
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-March/003877.html).
Thanks,
-Joe
On 3/12/2016 1:28 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Looks good Joe.
-Chris
On 11 Mar 2016, at 22:28, joe darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hello,
As Jon Gibbons has noted off-list, the problem list entries can directly
include the bug number associated with the test in question, enabling better
reporting. This format should be used rather than the current convention of
putting the bug number in a comment.
Please review the webrev to adopt the revised format for the problem list:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8151763.0/
I've verified jtreg produces the same test list with the old and new versions
of the problem list.
Thanks,
-Joe
