Hi Nadeesh,

An internal reviewer pointed out that Duration does not have 'fields' (it is not a TemporalAccessor)
so the description might be clarified by saying:

+ * Truncating the duration returns a copy of the original with *conceptual *fields
+     * smaller than the specified unit set to zero.

The rest is fine.  Reviewed

Thanks, Roger



On 3/30/2016 9:33 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Yes, that looks OK now.
thanks
Stephen


On 30 March 2016 at 12:25, nadeesh tv <nadeesh...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Stephen,

Thanks for the comments.
Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8148849/webrev.01/

Made a change in unit == ChronoUnit.SECONDS  also


Regards,
Nadeesh TV


On 3/29/2016 6:10 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
We're almost there, but looking at the tests, it looks like the
behaviour is wrong:

The intended behaviour is that
-20.5mins (minus 20 minutes 30 secs) should truncate to -20mins
-2.1secs truncate to -2secs

Note that the truncation is different to Instant here.
An Instant truncates towards the far past - like RoundingMode.FLOOR
A Duration truncates towards the zero - like RoundingMode.DOWN

Stephen


On 29 March 2016 at 13:18, nadeesh tv <nadeesh...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi all,

Bug Id : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148849

Enhanced Duration by adding   public Duration truncatedTo(TemporalUnit
unit)

Please http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8148849/webrev.00/

--
Thanks and Regards,
Nadeesh TV

--
Thanks and Regards,
Nadeesh TV


Reply via email to