Hi Nadeesh,
An internal reviewer pointed out that Duration does not have 'fields'
(it is not a TemporalAccessor)
so the description might be clarified by saying:
+ * Truncating the duration returns a copy of the original with
*conceptual *fields
+ * smaller than the specified unit set to zero.
The rest is fine. Reviewed
Thanks, Roger
On 3/30/2016 9:33 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Yes, that looks OK now.
thanks
Stephen
On 30 March 2016 at 12:25, nadeesh tv <nadeesh...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8148849/webrev.01/
Made a change in unit == ChronoUnit.SECONDS also
Regards,
Nadeesh TV
On 3/29/2016 6:10 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
We're almost there, but looking at the tests, it looks like the
behaviour is wrong:
The intended behaviour is that
-20.5mins (minus 20 minutes 30 secs) should truncate to -20mins
-2.1secs truncate to -2secs
Note that the truncation is different to Instant here.
An Instant truncates towards the far past - like RoundingMode.FLOOR
A Duration truncates towards the zero - like RoundingMode.DOWN
Stephen
On 29 March 2016 at 13:18, nadeesh tv <nadeesh...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Bug Id : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148849
Enhanced Duration by adding public Duration truncatedTo(TemporalUnit
unit)
Please http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8148849/webrev.00/
--
Thanks and Regards,
Nadeesh TV
--
Thanks and Regards,
Nadeesh TV