On 04/09/2016 12:33 PM, Christoph Engelbert wrote: > Not sure it would risk breaking compatibility. It’s fairly easy to > support it by just replacing underscore before parsing. Do you think > of code that is expected to not parse underscore arguments?
Yes. > I think it’s a fair request to support underscore based integer > representations, even though I never needed it yet, anyhow it makes > sense to me to give users the possibility to have the same integer > representation in, let’s say, properties files. Code which rejects underscores in strings today would not reject underscores if this were changed. This is a change which is visible to applications. Andrew.
