Hi Roger, I don't think this is covered in any alternate tests, because this Displayname format is newly introduced with tzdata2016b for the newly added TimeZones.
Anyway, I will double check on this to see if any test already covers this scenario otherwise I will update or add a new test case to cover this. Regards, Ramanand. -----Original Message----- From: Roger Riggs Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 8:26 PM To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR: 8151876: (tz) Support tzdata2016c Hi Ramanand, The change to the test.java.time.format.TestZoneTextPrinterParser.test_ParseText just eliminates the test. Is there an alternate test that the formatter is returning the correct value for the GMT+/- cases? Roger On 4/11/2016 6:59 AM, Ramanand Patil wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like someone from java.time to do a second review for this. > > Regards, > Ramanand. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Masayoshi Okutsu > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 5:09 AM > To: Ramanand Patil; i18n-...@openjdk.java.net > Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: RFR: 8151876: (tz) Support tzdata2016c > > Looks good to me. But I'd like someone from java.time to review the changes > to see if it's OK for java.time. > > Masayoshi > > On 4/4/2016 6:50 PM, Ramanand Patil wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Please review the latest TZDATA (tzdata2016c) integration to JDK9. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151876 >> >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8151876/webrev.00/ >> >> All the TimeZone related tests are passed after integration. >> >> >> >> Please note that this patch includes both tzdata2016b and tzdata2016c >> integration. The tzdata2016b review was abandoned because tzdata2016c was >> already released. >> >> As suggested by Masayoshi, changes are made such that, "GMT+hh:mm" is used >> for formatting of the newly added TimeZones in tzdata2016b. >> >> [This is done to accommodate the IANA's new trial system where the >> new zones use numeric time zone abbreviations like "+04" instead of >> invented abbreviations like "ASTT".] >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Ramanand.
