> On 19 Apr 2016, at 18:57, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote: >> The LEAF_TARGET version does not change the results significantly. If >> you feel that using LEAF_TARGET is more suitable I can update webrev >> correspondingly. >> > > It has some appeal, since there is a symmetry to using that and the threshold > at which the wrapping spliterator will no longer be split by F/J tasks. Up to > you. >
Thinking some more about this, i think it would be preferable. It reduces the explicit referral to ForkJoinPool.getCommonPoolParallelism(). In general the binding the the common pool is an something we want to relax, but its tricky to come up with a sane parallel policy mechanism. Paul.
