Thanks for information. I'm looking at it. I'm also in contact with JacORB team regarding the compatibility issues. I should be able to present more elaborate opinion about 2.3.1 vs 3.3 compatibility (especially regarding Security Service) at the beginning of the next week.
Regards, Tomek -- Tomasz Adamski Software Engineer JBoss by Red Hat ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Bateman" <[email protected]> > To: "Tomasz Adamski" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Andrew Dinn" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 12:59:45 PM > Subject: Re: RFR: 8152084: Introduction of ssliop protocol to corbaloc > > > > On 05/05/2016 13:51, Tomasz Adamski wrote: > > Added classes are indeed generated from idl present in Security Server > > Specification which is part of Corba 3.3 specification. I can find no > > information about formal corba compliance process. Can you please point me > > to people who can help me regarding this? > > > I see that the CORBA specs have a section on Compliance but it's not > something that I can really comment on. In the Oracle docs then the > "Official Specifications for CORBA support" [1] has the references and > details on what is supported in the Oracle JDK, which should match what > is in OpenJDK. Note that it does says "J2SE 5.0", just a reflection that > this has not been rev'ed in 12+ years, hence the nervousness about > adding parts of CORBA 3.3. > > -Alan > > [1] > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/idl/compatibility-CORBA.html#spec >
