Hi Roger, On May 10, 2016, at 8:03 AM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Good catch, the javadoc needs to match the code and in this case the new > language > does not match the code. Some cases are harder to follow because they > delegate > to other classes for copying. I think I’ll drop BufferedWriter from this RFR and let Pavel handle it in 8029804. > It may also be the case that since Writer.write(char[], off, len) is > abstract, it cannot enforce the contract > consistently on all subclasses and something special will be needed for that > javadoc. I’ll see whether this needs changing before revving. Thanks, Brian
