Hi Joe, Yes, that is useful. I had not recalled seeing the emphasis tag before so I was curious as to the policy.
Thanks, Brian On May 24, 2016, at 11:59 AM, joe darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> wrote: > As I understand it, if one is being pedantic about HTML tags, "<em>" is more > of a semantic tag while "<i>" is purely typographical so there are cases > where "<i>" should not be replaced by "<em>". > > On 5/24/2016 11:44 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> >> At new line 1902 and elsewhere, is <em/> preferable to <i/> in general? (Not >> a question pertaining only to this change.)
