Joe, Christoph,
Thanks for your reviews!
With Best Regards,
Aleksej
On 18/08/16 08:47, Langer, Christoph wrote:
+1, nice fix.
-----Original Message-----
From: core-libs-dev [mailto:core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
Of Joe Wang
Sent: Mittwoch, 17. August 2016 18:30
To: Aleks Efimov <aleksej.efi...@oracle.com>
Cc: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR (JAXP): 8146961: Fix PermGen memory leaks caused by static
final Exceptions
Looks good, Aleksej. Thanks for coming up with a well-thought solution
to get rid of the static RE field.
Best,
Joe
On 8/17/16, 7:04 AM, Aleks Efimov wrote:
Hi Joe, Aleksey,
Thank you for reviewing the initial fix.
I followed the Joe's suggestion (thanks for that) and removed static
'abort' field completely, the functionality was replaced by throwing
the exception of newly added type - AbortException. The new webrev
with removed 'abort' can be found here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8146961/9/01
The Tomcat reproducer attached to the bug report fails without the fix
and passes with the new version of the fix.
The JPRT and JCK testing again shows no related jaxp tests failures.
Best Regards,
Aleksej
On 15/08/16 21:09, Joe Wang wrote:
Hi Aleksej,
I suggest we get rid of the static abort. If RuntimeException
happens, check where it happens. The first use case looks suspicious
as it just returns if it's an instance of RE. For the 2nd case in DOM
error report, let's throw a RuntimeException with the specified error
message if error happens, and there's no handler or the handler
failed to handle it. (would be better than an empty RE)
Best,
Joe
On 8/15/16, 10:38 AM, Aleks Efimov wrote:
Hi,
Please, help to review the fix for memory leak [1] in
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.DOMNormalizer that is caused
by usage of static final exceptions.
This problem was already fixed in Apache Xerces project [2] and I
would like to backport it to JDK9 Xerces implementation.
Webrev with the changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8146961/9/00
The Tomcat reproducer attached to the bug report fails without the
fix and passes with the fix.
The JPRT and JCK testing shows no jaxp tests failures with the
proposed fix.
With Best Regards,
Aleksej
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146961
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1667