> On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Naoto Sato <naoto.s...@oracle.com> wrote: > > According to an internal review, I added some explanation to the > modification. No logic modifications. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8166645/webrev.01/
This looks okay. I suggest to keep Set<String> originals after splitting the input byte array such that 325 .filter(t -> original.indexOf(t) != -1) can be replaced with .filter(originals::contains) Mandy
