Hey, since I created the original mail I hope you don't mind my interest/comments. What about using !isArray() && isLocalOrAnonymousClass() &&getSimpleBinaryName0() == null;to increase readability a bit?
Thanks for investigating my initial interest on that level! Cheers, Christoph > Hi, > > due to recent interest to optimize Class.isAnonymousClass[1] I took > a look at the implementation and found that we can further improve > performance of this method, especially when asking non-anonymous > classes[2]. > > As such calls are a common occurrence during startup and bootstrap > of lambdas this actually appears rather worthwhile: > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8170595/webrev.01/ > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170595 > > Thanks! > > /Claes > > [1] >http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-December/045116.html > [2] > Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units > Clazz.isAnonymousClass_Anon avgt 50 200.900 ± 15.503 ns/op > Clazz.isAnonymousClass_Regular avgt 50 136.896 ± 9.605 ns/op > > Clazz.isAnonymousClass_Anon avgt 50 186.564 ± 12.219 ns/op > Clazz.isAnonymousClass_Regular avgt 50 33.878 ± 1.524 ns/op > > See bug for benchmark source > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht Ende----- --- Die Bundesliga hat begonnen! Alle Tore, alle Ergebnisse, alle News: Pocket Liga jetzt im https://app.adjust.com/dpynzd oder https://app.adjust.com/dpynzd herunterladen - kostenlos!
