Thanks Claes! That's helpful, we'll pick a few of these over on adoption-discuss and come back here to start a discussion on the relevant issue(s) before we start.
Cheers, Martijn On 2 December 2016 at 13:12, Claes Redestad <claes.redes...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd suggest start looking at requests for code cleanup, performance > optimizations or similar that doesn't > alter any public semantics (such as adding public APIs or subtly changing > the behavior of existing > ones). > > A few simple JBS searches lists at least some things that look tempting: > > "Cleanup": > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22Clea > nup%22%20%26%26%20status%20in%20(Open)%20and%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY > > "Optimize": > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22Clea > nup%22%20%26%26%20status%20in%20(Open)%20and%20assignee%20is%20EMPTY > > Some, mostly hotspot engineers, use the "starter" label to mark issues > thought to be good candidates for someone new to the project (this doesn't > necessarily > mean "easy"): > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?jql=labels%20in%20(%22 > starter%22)%20%26%26%20status%20in%20(Open) > > Hope this helps! > > /Claes > > On 2016-12-01 22:58, Patrick Reinhart wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I wanted to ask if there is a simple JBS query to find small clean up >> parts to help with? >> >> Seems to me a good starting point for some „hacking-on-the-OpenJDK-sessio >> ns“ >> >> >> -Patrick >> > >
