I'm trying to understand this update. Does "/-" imply "/foo"?
Does the following spec can be used to explain the new added note?
* <li>if the wildcard flag is "-", the simple pathname's path
* must be recursively inside the wildcard pathname's path.
Xuelei
On 12/19/2016 11:25 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Ping again.
On Dec 14, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Wang Weijun <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
An clarification is added to FilePermission::implies:
* @implNote
....
* a simple {@code npath} is recursively inside a wildcard {@code npath}
* if and only if {@code simple_npath.relativize(wildcard_npath)}
- * is a series of one or more "..". An invalid {@code FilePermission} does
+ * is a series of one or more "..". Note that this means "/-" does not
+ * imply "foo". An invalid {@code FilePermission} does
* not imply any object except for itself.
The newly added sentence is
Note that this means "/-" does not imply "foo".
JCK has agreed to update their test.
Since this is just a clarification inside an @implNote and no spec is updated,
I suppose no CCC is needed. Please confirm.
Thanks
Max
