> On 1 Feb 2017, at 08:44, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com > <mailto:paul.san...@oracle.com>> wrote: > > I think that would be too pedantic as well. At this late stage in 9 i prefer > to leave things as they are and not fiddle. Revise for 10? > > We could, but jsr166 primitive version control technology doesn't have a > mechanism to maintain such distinctions. >
Ok. Sorry for being so conservative, just concerned given the schedule. > I still think the jdk9 docs are misleading and we should do something to fix > them. The high-level bit for users is "Bulk operations are non-atomic"! > Maybe we should include that sentence?! Ok. Paul.
