Greetings. the method
public static ObjectName getInstance(String domain,
Hashtable<String,String> table)
throws MalformedObjectNameException {
return new ObjectName(domain, table);
}
in javax.management.ObjectName allows for a provided Hashtable to
specify properties for the objectname.
The semantics of an ObjectName don't consider the order of these
properties, however certain tools like jconsole (when used as a name for
a jmx property) does consider the order.
If you wish to create a folder structure to report metrics in jmx, you
need to use this properties map to specify the folder names. JConsole,
then, uses order of iteration to determine the order of the folder
hierarchy.
Suppose you want a folder hierarchy similar to a package name, you may
specify properties like
table.put("a0", "com");
table.put("a1", "acme");
table.put("name", "MyMetric");
in hopes of producing a metric in JConsole in the folder structure,
com/acme/MyMetric.
The problem is of course, that the argument is a Hashtable, not a Map,
and so the items are not ordered at all, yet JConsole uses iteration
order to build the path, so you may get
acme/ao/MyMetric or MyMetric/acme/ao or .....
This means if you really want to have ordered packages, you have to
derive from Hashtable, and override the entrySet() method, including
that set's iterator() to return the values in the order you wish to have
them shown.
That is really janky.
I'm proposing that the interface for getInstance be softened to
public static ObjectName getInstance(String domain,
Map<String,String> table)
as well as
public ObjectName(String domain, Map<String, String> table)
thoughts?
