Hi,
as this now significantly helps with one of our startup regression, and
the change is very low risk, I've retargetted to 9. Any objections?
/Claes
On 03/01/2017 05:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 03/01/2017 06:11 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Sure, with a bit of fix-up this drops another 170k executed bytecodes
to read in the java.security file (original: 1882k, now: 980k):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8176041/jdk.02/
Ok, that's fine.
This is slightly more idiomatic, you might want to change before pushing:
c = (char)(b & 0xFF);
Thanks,
-Aleksey
