Looks fine Stuart.
-Chris.
> On 30 Mar 2017, at 02:20, Stuart Marks <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please review this small, non-normative textual change to j.u.Observable.
> This class, and its companion Observer interface, were deprecated earlier in
> JDK 9. Doug Lea suggested adding a link to j.u.c.Flow in case people confused
> these APIs with reactive streams. (AFAICS reactive streams doesn't use the
> terms observer/observable, but RxJava does.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> s'marks
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # User smarks
> # Date 1490835538 25200
> # Wed Mar 29 17:58:58 2017 -0700
> # Node ID 7b9ea7fa93c00698325d38cfc108cd6e79bffe10
> # Parent 6b43c4698752779793d58813f46d3687c17dde75
> 8155052: add notes and links to j.u.Observer/Observable deprecation comments
> Reviewed-by: XXX
>
> diff -r 6b43c4698752 -r 7b9ea7fa93c0
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Observable.java
> --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Observable.java Tue Mar 28
> 18:12:38 2017 -0700
> +++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Observable.java Wed Mar 29
> 17:58:58 2017 -0700
> @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@
> * {@link java.beans} package. For reliable and ordered
> * messaging among threads, consider using one of the concurrent data
> * structures in the {@link java.util.concurrent} package.
> + * For reactive streams style programming, see the
> + * {@link java.util.concurrent.Flow} API.
> */
> @Deprecated(since="9")
> public class Observable {
