> On 27 Apr 2017, at 11:32, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good!
>
Thanks, i made the changes you propose in the previous emails.
> ---
>
> Consider changing parameter name of findVarHandle name to make it clearer
> it's a field name
> name => fieldName
> findVarHandle(Class<?> recv, String name, Class<?> type)
>
“name” is consistently used throughout, so i would prefer to keep as in and
consider doing something more global if necessary. I don’t really have a strong
opinion on this.
> I might have named these methods instanceFieldVarHandle and
> staticFieldVarHandle to make it clearer there are many kinds of VarHandle and
> ways of obtaining them. But probably too late now.
>
They are kept in sync with the method handle getter/setter equivalents.
> ---
>
> it's => its
>
> 1921 * {@code volatile} declaration) in accordance to it's specified
> 1922 * access modes.
>
Done.
Pal.
