This discussion has now transitioned to an RFR [1] Thanks,
Brian [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-May/047841.html On May 23, 2017, at 2:08 PM, Brian Burkhalter <brian.burkhal...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On May 23, 2017, at 1:02 PM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> The bug number does help trace the original/stimulus for the test; >> you can push the new test as subtask. > > So the new test would have the sub-task issue ID in its @bug tag and the main > issue would be resolved CNR? > >> line 36: I would probably add a comment with the readable time. >> Its nice to know when that if someone had to debug the time on file. >> >> And it's worth a couple of extra characters to add the units (ms) to the >> error at line 70. >> >> Otherwise looks fine. > > I will make those changes. > > Thanks, > > Brian
