Ah, this question comes up once in a while, the biggest questions in my mind are: 1) It's easy to lose context when intermediate libraries/Executors get involved, how does the developer detect and fix it? 2) It's unclear what fan-in behaviors like zip, merge etc mean in terms of what the local values should be? 3) It's unclear what fan-out behaviors like split, route, broadcast mean in terms of what the local values should be?
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > There's not likely to be any support for local context anywhere in > java.util.concurrent, but it seems not too hard to roll your own support > with a custom executor to be used with CompletableFuture that kept track of > any local context. > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Pavel Rappo <pavel.ra...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> General questions on concurrency in Java should be asked here: >> >> http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest >> >> > On 18 May 2017, at 21:57, Dean Hiller <dhil...@twitter.com> wrote: >> > >> > Way more detail here... >> > >> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37933713/does-completable >> future-have-a-corresponding-local-context >> > >> > So I was wondering if this was going to be added at some point to the >> jdk >> > as I could not figure out how to set something so it was still >> available on >> > the thread at a later time when traversing async thenCompose, >> thenAccept. >> > >> > thanks, >> > Dean >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Concurrency-interest mailing list > concurrency-inter...@cs.oswego.edu > http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest > > -- Cheers, √